Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverQuest trade skills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 15:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] EverQuest trade skills

EverQuest trade skills (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No sources, lack of notability, and reads somewhat like a crufty game guide.

With the lack of sources, this article has failed to establish its notability to non-EverQuest players and the real world, suggesting that those who do not play the series would not be interested in reading this article.

It also contains fancruft which has the tendency to attract original research unwelcome to Wikipedia.

In addition, the article itself reads somewhat like a game guide, something Wikipedia is not and is generally unwanted. IAmSasori (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per the nominator fails many core policies of Wikipedia as well as the five pillars. (jarbarf) (talk) 19:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom--Rtphokie (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Starionwolf (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 10:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge - there is not likely to be reliable 3rd party sources about this topic to confirm notability for stand-alone article. Any salvagable information should be merged into another article. GundamsЯus (talk) 14:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete at best this is a gameplay snippet from an individual game article or something that would belong in a series article (already deleted). It's been here since 2004 and remains the equivalent of an article on the first 3 pages of a novel. Someoneanother 21:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.