Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Even Bread Has a Home

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 04:26Z

[edit] Even Bread Has a Home

Even Bread Has a Home (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Template:Bread Books (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Template:Take2Books (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Not notable book. Ran a google search on the author, came up with two relevant results, from two libraries. Amazon doesn't sell it. Publisher is not notable, apparently. Neither is the author. Should be deleted. Wehwalt 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No assertion of notability. Xiner (talk, email) 01:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Edeans 03:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Google of the publisher shows up zero non-Wikipedia hits, suggesting this is self published. Natalie 04:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Question. There is a template of this publishing company, which I would also propose should be deleted. Is it totally against policy to add it to this discussion? Otherwise I'll bop on over to TfD. Natalie 04:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete article and template. If it's not good enough for Amazon, it's not good enough for us. :-) Realkyhick 08:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete book with no assertion or verification of notability.-- danntm ^T _C 18:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.