Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Laurence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Strangerer (Talk) 23:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eve Laurence

Eve Laurence (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Eve Laurence is not notable enough to be on Wikipedia, based on the pornographic actors' notablility criteria. w^{L<speak·check>} 23:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep WP:PORNBIO states that "modern American heterosexual performers are usually notable if they appear in more than 100 films". There are 88 listed on the page but that hasn't been updated for a while. A quick Google finds this page (warning NSFW) listing 149 DVDs from her. However the list of films is a copyvio from IMDB so I've deleted it, leaving only a stub. EliminatorJR ^Talk 01:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

  The same guideline says "so using any simple count of number of films that a performer starred in to determine notability is very controversial". Is there anything else that would note her notability? --w^{L<speak·check>} 04:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep IAFD lists 99 titles, DVDEmpire lists 149 titles. Notable. --Pixelface 02:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• My vote is to keep the page. If it needs to be built up from the stub that can be done. There used to be more info on here but got deleted at various stages. --de1841 March 27
• Keep. Pornocruft. Herostratus 13:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - same as above. CoolGuy 18:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.