Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurosong Cup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Peacent 18:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eurosong Cup

Eurosong Cup (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No references whatsoever: even a Google search here returns ZERO results. Maybe a hoax? Not sure... never heard of this thing before, might be completely made-up. EuroSong talk 22:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - my nomination. EuroSong talk 22:41, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. A competition that may take place in 2009 isn't something we should have an article on. If this takes off there will be ample publicity during selection of competitors, host city, venues, and so forth. --Dhartung | Talk 22:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Editors should note that "Eurosong" is the name given to several countries' national competitions to select an entrant for Eurovision, including Ireland and Belgium. --Dhartung | Talk 22:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) Snow delete WP:CRYSTAL and probably hoax. Somehow, I think Eurosong knows what he's talking about here. Whsitchy 22:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Speculation at best, hoax at worst. Without any sources, it must go. DarkAudit 22:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, hoax, shame really as I'd be interested to see the Vatican City entry for the competition. EliminatorJR Talk 22:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as hoax, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I don't see a speedy category here, probably best to run it through AfD so it can be G4'd if it's re-created. EliminatorJR Talk 23:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment Agree with EliminatorJR. Hoaxes are not a speedy category -- they're best handled with as many eyes as possible, unfortunately, because there may be that one editor who swings through who knows it isn't. --Dhartung | Talk 05:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Dhartung. ~EdBoy[c] 00:18, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a hoax. I'm relatively well-up on "countries who want to enter ESC soon" (which is frequently nothing but rumour-mongering anyway), and a great many of these would-be entries are news to me. Western Sahara, Bermuda and Svalbard sound rather like wishful thinking. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 08:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - No sourced citations in the article whatsoever to establish notability. Smee 08:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete - not only is notability not established there is no evidence that it will ever exist. TerriersFan 16:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.