Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European exploration of Arabia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 15:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] European exploration of Arabia

European exploration of Arabia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Just a list that duplicates the category Explorers of Arabia. Anjouli 17:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete per nominator's argument. This "list" is redundant. Corpx 19:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep have expanded and made into less of a list. The external links I have added provide plenty more room for expansion and show how a good encyclopedic article can be created on this topic. Davewild 20:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Davewild. --ざくら木 23:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Valid topic, just poorly written. --Hemlock Martinis 04:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Even though I nominated it. Now that people are working on it, it deserves a bit more time to see if it can be more than just a list.Anjouli 15:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, redundant, poor quality, suggests that "Europe" is here since 18th century and is pretty much limited to Britain, missing context, unclear title. Pavel Vozenilek 15:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Are you joking? We don't delete articles because they need improvement, we improve them! --Hemlock Martinis 18:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete poorly sourced unencyclopediac list--SefringleTalk 02:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. Redundant with a category is no reason to delete. A category doesn’t substitute for an article, nor vice versa. --SmokeyJoe 03:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.