Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Laser Institute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cbrown1023 talk 16:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] European Laser Institute
This Institute (it's an association) has existed since 2003, yet has only 113 Google hits. I submit that it is not notable. Prod tag removed. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 05:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete since it fails WP:CORP. Habanero-tan (talk) 06:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:CORP, no evidence of notability through Google News/Scholar/Books/Search. Atyndall93 | talk 07:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORP. Aside from that, no sources are provided to prove notability. PeterSymonds | talk 09:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. -[[Ryan]] (me) (talk) 11:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I added some references from Google News archives. See also http://www.google.com/search?q=%22European+Laser+Institute%22+site%3Aeu Besides, there is considerable public interest in lasers. --Eastmain (talk) 00:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment, those references don't say much. Has this association ever done anything? Phlegm Rooster (talk) 00:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. According to the article, ELI organizes conferences and workshops, sometimes in cooperation with the Laser Institute of America (LIA), and publishes the Journal of Laser Applications. --Eastmain (talk) 02:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Jointly publishes with three other groups. All associations have meetings, and the sources you have found are press releases (one by a European Photonics Industry Consortium) and an announcement by one of the partner intitutions (in German), so I think it is still not notable. The Laser Institute of America has 239 Google news hits, 498 Google books hits and a couple of thousand Google scholar hits, for the sake of comparison. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 03:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
