Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurolingue 2

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete by Geogre. —Cryptic (talk) 03:53, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Eurolingue

Delete. Euroclone #9980. It looks like the language was only started very recently, and that it hasn't acquired any significance yet. Of the ca. 1000 ghits most point to a language institute of the same name. The mailing list for Eurolingue has only 4 members and 13 messages. The same article was deleted on July 21 after this VfD. IJzeren Jan 07:18, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

• Deletolingue per nom. --Alan Au 07:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete seems like vanity to me to turn an individual's geocities language into encyclopedic material. Oh, and only 4 members. Rkevins82 08:10, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Google search for "Eurolingue language" gets 389 Ghits, none of those on the first three pages relating to this auxlang. (Memo to auxlang creators: try to pick a name for your language that doesn't already get scads of Google hits for something unrelated.) --Jim Henry | Talk 14:33, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or speedy as recreation of previously-VfDed material. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:35, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, verifiable. arj 12:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Take a look at Wikipedia:Conlangs/Notability, verifiability, merit, completeness#Verifiability and Original Research. The discussion about verifiability of conlangs has centered around whether they have been extensively discussed by people other than the creators of the language. Do you see any evidence of that w.r.t. Eurolingue? If the only possible source for the article is the creator's website, it verges on original research. --Jim Henry | Talk 15:50, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete substantially the same article as one previously deleted per the deletion policy. I'll so nominate it. Robert A West 17:50, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Sure, I can live with that! --IJzeren Jan 18:11, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.