Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurojews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. - Bobet 12:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eurojews

Utterly non-notable organisation, article is a vanity project for the group with phrases like "a unique society was created" and "the society was born". No independent hits on Google. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 05:21, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator. --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) 05:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn organisation. --Terence Ong 05:55, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Melchoir 06:58, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 09:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete 573 Ghits--Jusjih 14:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom --Strothra 16:29, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:44, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, notability and relevance not asserted, no membership figures and inclusion criteria mentioned, no mention of agenda/activities other than "meetings". JFW | T@lk 19:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, because this article is only a stub and it is about a young organization about which more research is required. It is premature to delete this article. It may have significance to Europe's young Jews. Unfortunately, this article is part of a large group of articles that were recently nominated for deletion and about which there is at present much friction see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Nomination by PZFUN, and Speedy keep of several articles by Slimvirgin, so it would be advisable for this nomination to be withdrawn until further notice. IZAK 22:06, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Virtual communities have strict notability guidelines. nn. —Viriditas | Talk 22:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep pending further research. I can read German -- perhaps there is more on this org in non-English languages? I found over 500 hits on a Google "advanced search" in a variety of languages. One was a German article about various activites there. Another was from the Prague Journal. The org was founded in Amsterdam in 1998 -- anbody here read Dutch? My point being, just because it does not pop up tons of refs in English does not mean it doesn't exist...Rooster613 00:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Rooster613Rooster613
Your point would be valid if Google hits established notability but they do not. If notability cannot be established inside the article then the article fails to meet the standards of Wikipedia. --Strothra 02:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I speak all of those languages, and there are none. Even the group's own "website" is entirely non-functional.[1] Páll (Die pienk olifant) 13:42, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.