Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Oak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eugene Oak

Article is an autobiography, and although its subject has written some books, the article does not fully assert his notability. – ClockworkSoul 23:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. He also appears to be practicing law without a licence, although I'm sure that's just an omission on the article author's part. Tevildo 23:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The books he quotes are actually instruction pamphlets, all on or around the same topic. Doubtless a worthy man, but not notable.--Anthony.bradbury 23:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete from main article space. I have tagged the article as such. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 23:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. An interesting combination of credentials adds up to being notable. -- TruthbringerToronto 00:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Anthony.bradbury. -- Kjkolb 01:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A non-notable resume puffed up to try to look important. Though it IS interesting how he's practicing law without the slightest mention of a law degree or Bar exam. --Calton | Talk 08:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.