Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugene Lewis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  15:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eugene Lewis

Delete. No more notable than the typical academic. Still A Student 16:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

  • ""Public Entrepreneurship: Toward a Theory of Bureaucratic Political Power" does have 40 cites according to google schoolar, at least when spelt correctly. Not a hell of a lot, but google scholar misses a lot. So Neutral. Ben Aveling 17:16, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep first it was Violinists, then Economists and now it's Delete Political Scientists Week! He was Provost of his college. Dlyons493 Talk 21:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Someone who is provost of a university is notable. JoshuaZ 22:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Seems to meet notability requirements to me. Edgar181 23:45, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, unless "no more notable than the typical Pokemon creature," "no more notable than the typical porn star," and "no more notable than the typically inbred British peer" became policy grounds for article deletion in the last day or so. Monicasdude 01:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Which is intended to "set the bar rather low" and written to supplant the very much non-consensus standard you listed. Monicasdude 01:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. It would seem consensus will be to keep, and I'm comfortable with that. But the "non-consensus" standard I listed was meant to reflect the standard expressed on that page. If being a typical academic makes one notable, every person with an office in my building meets the standard. And I suppose soon enough, they will all have articles. Still A Student 02:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Contemporary Authors Online on Galenet has him credited with four books which seem to have been widely reviewed. That makes him notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 02:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep He meets notability requirements. DanaBassett 20:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per the Crobat test. Stifle 01:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.