Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etnika

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Etnika

Etnika (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Vanispamcruftisement. Contested prod. MER-C 04:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless more reviews and sources asserting noteability can be found. Dr bab 10:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC).
• Keep. The article has been greatly improved since being nominated for AfD. I also found plenty of sources on Google (even after discounting plenty of false positives). -- Seed 2.0 20:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment FD: I have nothing to do with the band and had never seen the article before this AfD (ie. I'm not biased ;). I'm just doing some cleanup. -- Seed 2.0 20:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, the rootsworld and maltatoday links convince me that they're notable enough for an article. Corvus cornix 21:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - sufficient media coverage to substantiate claim of notability and create well-referenced article ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 18:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems worth enough for inclusion, meets WP:Music. A1octopus 18:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.