Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnic pornography

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP unanimously apart from nominator, with Dcarrano taken as keep. -Splash 01:24, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ethnic pornography

Far Left bias, Google results yeild irrelevant returns, not a real genre of pornography. I vote to delete.TheDoober 09:11, 14 July 2005 (UTC)

• So, Black Tail, Asian Fever, Asian Babes, Big Black Meat 6, Bombay Bitches, Black Dicks in White Chicks, Cock Craving Chicas, Latina Cochina, Black GangBangers #11 and Bang My White Ass (to name some of the less offensive titles) are fevered dreams of the far-left imagination? Google for "interracial dvd", and Google gives you an estimated 818,000 hits. I could go on, but Wikipedia is not a porn search engine. Indeed, many (most?) of the DVD sales sites have explicit "Asian", "Latina" and "Interracial" categories provided for genre enthusiasts' convenience. See also my computation on the talk page that roughly 6% of "adult films" have ethnic terms in their titles. Google gives 289 hits for the exact phrase "ethnic pornography". For just one of them, see the New York Press article The Chosen Peephole: Jews can do porn just as badly as everyone else., which mentions the even more unsettling subject of Holocaust pornography that depicts Jews as Nazi victims. Keep -- Karada 09:24, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Why not, it is a genre of porn. Redwolf24 09:26, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm amazed how many people get turned on by Asian women, or by black men. It's certainly a notable enough phenomenon. — JIP | Talk 09:38, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep far-left bias? pardon? :D jamesgibbon 12:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I see no reason to delete. Youngamerican 14:44, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, in agreement with Karada. The term isn't heavily used but it's the best general term to reference the real and pervasive phenomenon. Most non-niche pornsites have categories such as "Asian", and many niche sites are based on ethnicity. Barno 15:58, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Do the vast majority of these films depict interracial relationships? If so, rename to interracial pornography; if that name would be a misnomer, then keep, although it feels like a neologism. Dcarrano 19:46, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep agree with Karada. --PrologFan | Talk 20:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I don't find a reason for deletion aside from the redundant syntax. --jonasaurus 21:29, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
• Rename "ethnic" != "non-caucasian". siafu 23:26, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Caucasians are just another ethnic group, and are fetishized as exotic by, for example, the Japanese. "White" is not a default setting. -- The Anome 17:00, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I disagree with a rename to interracial pornography, which should have its own article. Pornography focused on members of a particular ethnic group is just as likely to be presented as solo pictorials. -- BD2412 ^talk 02:16, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (all together now with a quick chorus of Monty Python's "I like Chinese"...) Grutness...wha? 04:11, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep The "Jews are frequently depicted as large-breasted" comment struck me as funny since my experience is that they have a very nice range of sizes as I have learned from personal, um research. -- FunkyChicken! 06:03, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Anyone who claims that they have failed to turn up evidence of this as a real phenomenon has been unacceptably lazy in their so-called "research". Abstain for now on the best title for the article. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:32, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a notable genre of pornography. However it should be edited to be made less POV. -- Crevaner 23:47, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't really understand what is inappropriate with this article. -- Behemoth

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.