Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Etheric boxing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 21:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Etheric boxing

Etheric boxing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Confirmed conflict on interest on the noticeboard. The external link from the very two first words seems to indicate an intent to spam; at any rate, there's not much to assert notability. Shalom ^Hello 01:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No independent sources, just multiple links to the same website. Durova^Charge! 03:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I have tried to encourage the main editor (see talk page) to find some decent references but I suspect there aren't any and that this is indeed a spammy article with a major conflict of interest. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 11:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Shalom's reasoning: conflict of interest and hardly anything to assert the notability of the subject. Acalamari 18:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Shalom. Bucketsofg 23:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for all the shameful reasons noted above. Bearian 00:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 09:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.