Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternum Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 19:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Per outcome of a DRV this deletion is endorsed as a speedy deletion. That is, G4 will not apply if reliable sources are subsequently found. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eternum Online

Eternum Online (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Eternum (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - dab page, per comments below. Marasmusine 17:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

No assertion of notability (WP:N), no independent references (WP:V). Google search doesn't look promising. If Speedy A7 (for 'web content') also covers web-based games, this could be a speedy. Marasmusine 12:50, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 12:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom Percy Snoodle 14:22, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Though there is 1 short article on this game from www.mmorpg.com, it doesn't satisfy WP:RS as it's only 1 independant source. I'm on the fence on the A7, I don't think A7 really applies...it's a close one, but I'm going to learn towards that it doesn't apply. Regardless if speedy applies or not, there are not enough sources independant of the developer (and the game is only in beta right now anyways) and should still be deleted until more info on game comes out --sumnjim ^{talk with me·changes} 16:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable and lacking in sources. I'd suggest the DAB Eternum be added to this as well, as it was created for the purpose of this article and a prog rock band which doesn't have an article. No bias against recreation if the subject becomes notable. QuagmireDog 16:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I reckon A7 counts for this. No notability claimed at all. Get rid of the Eternum disambig page too. Miremare 17:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nn web content. Browser game not even out of beta. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.