Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estovakia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Estovakia

Estovakia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unsourced, but I know this comes from Ace Combat 6 by NBGI (Namco Bandai). This article needs to be completely rewritten, as it is doing nothing but writing fiction on a fictitious country. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 08:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Note: Associated AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Emmeria. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 09:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete for the same reasons I noted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Emmeria: this is inherently unverifiable, so its original research that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. There are plenty of places on the web where this information can be placed, Wikipedia is not one of them. Gwernol 03:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as completely lacking both context and assertion of notability. Goochelaar (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, sourced and verifiable information, and give editors time to expand per these suggestions. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:48, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Please take a closer look at articles before you vote keep. True, there is one citation in the article, but it is to a wiki, which is definitely not a reliable source. The article should therefore be considered unsourced. Pagrashtak 17:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
    • I have looked it over, though: [1] and [2]. Regards, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
      • I don't understand what that response is supposed to mean. Per WP:SPS, Wikis are not reliable sources: "For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources" TheBilly (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
        • I'm also confused. I said that there is one reference, which is to a wiki, then you provided the diff that confirmed my statement. Pagrashtak 16:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No reliable secondary sources, no assertion of notability, no real-world content. Pagrashtak 17:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for the same reason as the other one; notability reasons (which, being based on a guideline aren't really enough to justify deletion) aside, there is simply not any content here that justifies a separate article from Ace Combat 6. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynical (talk • contribs) 15:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
• Possible Merge Suggesting a merge into Nations of Ace Combat. Apparently another editor has supplied a pretty good list of nations in the Ace Combat series. If this article's information can be verified, I suggest merging the information there instead. - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 10:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.