Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonian freemasonry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Estonian freemasonry

There is only one source cited, and the majority of the stub is lifted almost directly from it. no one has added to this article since the original poster got tired of trying to force the subsection into Freemasonry a while back. MSJapan 04:37, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Seems like a perfectly legitimate encyclopedic topic. Paul August ☎ 05:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. What's wrong with Estonian freemasonry? I don't see any actual argument why it should be deleted. u p p l a n d 14:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 22:33, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Paul August. Stifle 23:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, a worthwhile topic—perhaps an Estonian freemason can contribute something about masonry in Estonia today with the history as an introduction —Pēters 18:06, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.