Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essence magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:23, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Essence magazine

This is a very short article, with one reference, the magazine's webpage. No support for the 1 or 2 claims is provided. Either expand or deleteTheRingess 23:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep. Major magazine. If it needs expanding or rewriting there are tags for that. Shouldn't go through AFD. 23skidoo 01:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

  Comment Only the author may vote for a speedy keep, equivalent to withdrawing the nomination. See Wikipedia:Speedy keep. Stifle 09:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep per 23skidoo. This is a well-known, nationally distributed magazine in the USA. --Metropolitan90 02:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Additional info -- its circulation is over 1 million, slightly higher than that of The New Yorker. [1] --Metropolitan90 02:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but requires expansion. Gram 10:44, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep notable and widely-read magazine. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Andrew Lenahan. Stifle 09:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.