Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escude

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche^{talk 5 pillars} July 1, 2005 20:33 (UTC)

[edit] Escude

No content, just obscure vanity. I tried to speedy delete this, calling it vanity. It was rejected as not speediable, but I can't imagine that this wouldn't fall into that category. What could I label it to pass muster as a speedy?Atomiktoaster 01:31, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as vanity. It's also a very short article with little or no context if you ask me. — Ливай | ☺ 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity, nn. Falphin 01:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The game's not even notable! humblefool® 02:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• There is no existing speedy deletion criterion that covers this. Vanity is not a speedy deletion criterion. The proposal to make "blatant vanity" a speedy deletion criterion was rejected. Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. Uncle G 03:17, 2005 Jun 23 (UTC)
• Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. — mark ✎ 08:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 10:07, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nnanity, and pity the 'pedia for turning away the opportunity at speedying these things. -Splash 16:08, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. CanadianCaesar 20:00, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. Wikiacc (talk) 21:14, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I think it could be argued that this could be covered under WP:CSD section 1.2.1. --Xcali 22:09, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity with no content. --Etacar11 22:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.