Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escats

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. CitiCat ♫ 04:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Escats

Escats (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not in English, but this is the English wikipedia. Not sure which Speedy category to go with, so I'm putting it here.  superβεεcat  19:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete translation of this page lacks third party/critical sources to justify the page in any language. NobutoraTakeda 19:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC) This user has been banned and !vote has been stricken. [1]
  • Delete - per above and notability - not listed on es.wikipedia.org —Travistalk 19:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

*Speedy delete A2 {{db-foreign}} applies here. Blueboy96 20:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

    • {{db-foreign}} only applies where the article on enwiki has the exact same content as the corresponding page on a foreign-language Wikipedia. Otherwise, it gets listed at WP:PNT. As noted by TravisTX, this does not have a page at eswiki. cab 02:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Change to neutral, leaning keep per Cab's translation. Would like to see some more reliable sources before going to keep. Blueboy96 16:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per Blueboy96.Hu 21:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Absolutley horrible speller. I can't even read what this says. ~ Infrangible 01:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, translate, and expand Non-trivial coverage in reliable sources can be found by searching on the band name or names of their members.[2][3] cab 02:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - I can't find anything notable other than they are a group of musicians. Unless someone can provide some sources that demonstrate notability I see no reason to keep this article. --Storm Rider (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per lack of multiple non-trivial sources; where are they??? Burntsauce 17:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The translatiion isuse is settled, so i have struck the comments on that issue that had not already been struck. The remaining issue seems to be notability and sources to establish it. Discussion on this only started after the translation, hence the relist. DES (talk) 16:41, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep cab has found adequate sources to keep this article. JulesH 17:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • And how exactly does this group fulfill WP:BIO? Strong DeleteBalloonman 18:33, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
    • By having significant coverage in independent reliable sources. JulesH 23:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep WP:BIO is problematic but a cursory web search turns up some amount of coverage, but I can't read a lot of it, as it's in Spanish. I'd like to give the author an opportunity to establish notability, and then reevaluate. - superβεεcat  20:26, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per above although their music appears to be Acid jazz if anything. Bearian 20:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.