Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escaflowne mechs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 02:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Escaflowne mechs

Escaflowne mechs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Violation of WP:NOT; just a list of mechas in the show Vision of Escaflowne without any real-world relevance to them. Prod removed by author. JuJube (talk) 06:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment: If the page survives AfD, it should be renamed to Escaflowne mechas or something similar. —Quasirandom (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, speedy if possible. From reading the article, particularly the bottom comment, this seems to be nothing more than a single editor's personal essay, opinions, and original research. We are not a web page hosting service and such a fan page belongs elsewhere. It doesn't even refer to the series by its proper name (Escaflowne is the movie, The Vision of Escaflowne is the anime series) and the relevant mechs of the series are already covered in List of The Vision of Escaflowne characters in the appropriate pilot sections. Collectonian (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete The only mecha I would expect to be able to pass notability is the Escaflowne itself. But as a class, the mecha of the Escaflowne series aren't that notable. It is also clearly someone's original research based on what they've seen via YouTube. (Do I really need to explain just how bad that is?) --Farix (Talk) 19:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Since it was started by a newbie, probably. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.