Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eryn Vorn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eryn Vorn

Eryn_Vorn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- (View AfD)

This place is never visited in LOTR. It does not warrant an encyclopedia page. It might be useful as part of a listing of places never visited, but not in its own article. --User:Hereiam2 1 February 2007 13:29 UTC

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - zero real world significance, unsourced. Merely a plot summary. MER-C 12:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - violates WP:OR, fancrufty conjecture. Moreschi ^Deletion! 21:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Pardon me for not knowing how to comment properly on these articles. However, I'm not sure how this item merits deletion. Simply because it was not visited in the LotR in no way makes it less of an item in the Middle-Earth canon. Also, whatever 'fancrufty conjecture' is, it doesn't appear to be that. It appears to reference Tolkien's few writings on the subject. Further, I don't see how one person can say it's a plot summary and the next says that it was never visited in LotR... Which is it? How can you summarize what was never visited? Lastly, as for real world significance, this is an article about a fictional location in Tolkien's Middle-Earth legendarium. None of the entries have any real world significance. Want to delete them all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.112.236 (talk • contribs)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Willing to reconsider if secondary sources can be provided establishing the subject's notability (in the real world). --maclean 02:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.