Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errolesque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Gareth Hughes 15:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Errolesque

Not in common usage, even it if were it would be more appropriate to wiktionary. GreetingsEarthling 17:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. WINAD for a start, and mnost of the 34 useful Googles are Wikimirrors anyway (at least 9 of them, according to my browser) so there is a vanishingly small amount of usage that we can rely on to establish that this word is actually in wide acceptance. Since I'm not really of the mind that this can be expanded to an article that talks about the history and abstract concept of the word, as an encyclopedic article would demand, it should go. -Splash^talk 20:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Splash. Xoloz 12:23, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.