Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Errol (Harry Potter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect Eluchil404 10:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Errol (Harry Potter)

• Delete. I do not believe this article describes a sufficiently notable subject to merit its own article. I suggest deleting it or merging it to Minor Harry Potter beasts. — Mike • 04:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Errol is already mentioned in it's respective main article; Weasley family. No need for it's own page. Death Eater Dan (Muahaha) 05:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Weasley family to avoid recreation and point readers in the right direction. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Weasley family per Mgm. Redirects are cheap. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Weasley family per above. This seems like the best option. NuncAutNunquam ^Talk 16:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. Ruddy bird doesn't need its own article. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect --->|Newyorktimescrossword 22:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)|
• Redirect.Freddie _Message? 23:28, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.