Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erratically Charged

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 22:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Erratically Charged

Erratically Charged (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable Spondyo (talk) 18:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Article is sourced, and subject seems notable RogueNinja_talk 18:58, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete the sources are mostly the radio stations own website, no reasonable assertion of notability Beeblbrox (talk) 20:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Comment "Mostly" their own website still doesnt mean it should be deleted. RogueNinja_talk 20:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

comment ok, fair enough, but the one link that isn't their website doesn't go to the promised review of the show, I just don't see any notability outside of this one college campus...Beeblbrox (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep, the subject seems notable enough for inclusion, particularly as the show was broadcast during the station's award winning year. The article is referenced, is of a sufficient length and follows the Manual of Style. It must be noted that the editor proposing this article for deletion has little or no other contributions, so his nomination must be treated with caution. Bob talk 13:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

comment You may have a point about this editor, but I still don't see any secondary sources to establish this show was notable.Beeblbrox (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep, as per Bob. Paste (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

• delete i could not find any reviews or other significant coverage in significant sources, almost everything that shows up is self published. --Asmodeus Samael (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks funny, but unless someone can bring a reliable source to establish notability, it doesn't belong. It's just a student radio show. AndyJones (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, unless independent reliable sources are provided. "It exists" is not a valid keep criterion. Corvus cornix_talk 21:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.