Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ErrantryWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ErrantryWiki

NN wiki. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Need info to judge notability. -- JJay 03:22, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• 281 articles. 281. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Thanks Again. Again. Thanks. Is 281 enough? Seems like a nice start to me. Of course, if you think that's not notable, maybe we could merge the info from your wiki noms into a wiki list of some type. Lists are always helpful, I find. Don't you agree?. -- JJay 09:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Being a wiki does not procure notability. --Apostrophe 05:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - A site's use of MediaWiki is irrelevant in determining notability. FCYTravis 07:01, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN wiki, does not meet WP:WEB Agnte 13:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Notability is not official Wikipedia policy, merely a guideline by which some but by no means all Wikipedians operate. The site exists and is verifiable. Jcuk 21:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. mikka (t) 23:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn.  Grue  14:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

This has fallen between the cracks, so I'm closing it myself. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.