Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erivan Haub

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --Daniel Olsen 01:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Erivan Haub

Erivan Haub (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article has been tagged with importance since January 30. It started out as non-notable, and it still is non-notable. I move to delete this page. Diez2 00:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep head of a large company for two decades, and a place on the Forbes world's richest list. Multi-billionaires are almost always notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Rough we-write from German Wikipedia completed, but still needs a ton of work. - 152.91.9.144 01:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Don't know enough on the topic to cast my vote either way... Spawn Man 02:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
pats Spawn Man on back in consolation Bwithh 03:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
So basically, what your saying Spawn Man is "editcount+1"? ---J.S (t|c) 20:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Very wealthy persons inherently encyclopedically notable Bwithh 03:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per others †he Bread 04:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. Anyone know if he's avaliable...? I can use a sugar daddy... Missvain 04:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep One of Forbes' richest people? Notable enough for you? Wavy G 08:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Yes, its true. Enough money can buy you an article on the Wikipedia. --The Way 11:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep per everyone, an owner of a notable company, and very rich. Michaelas10 (Talk) 15:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The article sounds like it was translated by Babelfish. Edison 16:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Sounds like a notable fellow... even if the article is malformed. ---J.S (t|c) 20:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very strong Keep- Highly notable. Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 16:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. I actually knew his name (as the owner of the A&P chain) independent of this article, which I must have read in published sources.  --LambiamTalk 02:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I strongly disagree with the view that wealth is inherently notable. Notability arises from actions, not accidents of birth. He was born into the business (he was put on the board at the age of 20, which doesn't suggest he worked his way up the hard way), and has simply lived with it. If he has done something notable let's hear about it, but on the basis of this entry he has done nothing that another businessman wouldn't also have done. I also fail to understand how he can have been awarded the DSC in 2004: no military career is noted. With this in mind, I vote to Delete. I also suggest we extend the voting on this one, and actively seek broader input; I feel the larger question of whether wealth alone is notable is worth broader debate, and this looks like a good test case. WMMartin 17:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.