Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ericsson R520

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - after reviewing the article, and the comments given; one states a weak keep, claiming "mild notability". The other keep makes an exceedingly weak argument based on red links. The delete comments, however, make remarks that are seen to be true within the article. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 08:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ericsson R520

Ericsson R520 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Yet another phone catalog entry. Non-notable phone, only references at present are a blog entry (!) and a review. Wikipedia is not a catalog, nor a directory. Mikeblas 12:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. This one seems to be mildly notable for certain design characteristics such as proximity sensors [1] and being the first handset with Bluetooth support [2]. Jakew 13:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - redlinks are annoying. (currently that template contains no redlinks). -Yyy 06:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment You know, there's a really easy way of getting rid of redlinks. Just replace [[this page doesn't exist]] with this page doesn't exist... Jakew 10:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
      • This would not contain any useful data. -Yyy 12:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the article contains no more than a claim the phone exists, it's shape and unsupported POV statements. If someone changes it from a catalogue entry to an encyclopaedia entry I will reconsider. Nuttah68 20:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom non notable phone.Pharaoh of the Wizards 01:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.