Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric pentle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Mailer diablo, but forgot to close. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eric pentle

Fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTO, biographical article on non-notable subject. VoiceOfReason 01:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, as per nom. Acyso 02:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, apparently a vanity submission, 2 unrelated Ghits, not able to find anything relating him to Central Party. Fails notability and probably WP:AUTO. -- H·G (^words/_works) 02:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete - WP:AUTO, and no sources verifying notability. BTW, don't measure everything in "ghits", internet is not all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CP\M (talk • contribs)

• Of course it's not all, but it's a good indicator when used in conjunction with other searches, as it was above. Nothing anywhere on the Central Party, no sources, and general notability failing coupled with that tends to seal the deal. I don't mean to rant, but I wish this didn't have to be rehashed every other time the word "Ghits" is used appropriately in an AfD discussion. -- H·G (^words/_works) 08:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, this smells a lot like a hoax to me, and I hate hoaxes. NawlinWiki 15:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Wisden17 15:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per NawlinWiki. AgentPeppermint 20:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.