Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Taubert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eric Taubert

Non-notable vanity biography (WP:VAIN, WP:BIO). Google searches indicate no accomplishments of note, except the usual blog and forum posts, etc. His stories are apparently unpublished, and the magazine he is editor of has yet to actually publish its first issue, according to its website. Sandstein 17:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I've been hasty: the article claims that his stories were published in what appear to be minor local publications and/or his own blog. Still falls way short of WP:BIO, though. Sandstein 17:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete. Has numerous publications, but none of note. I would say a borderline case of notability, that may get notable sometime in future. But not now. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 21:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Solidly fails WP:BIO Bwithh 22:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. I would like to point out that contrary to the advertisement at the bottom of the 1page, Wikiquote does not have a collection of quotations related to Eric Taubert. --Xrblsnggt 02:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as NN per WP:BIO. --Satori Son 02:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Clear vanity and advertising. I nowiki'd it, as I'm a little steamed at the free ride to Google stratospheres given this guy. Geogre 02:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Tip to nominator : Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! - Mailer Diablo 02:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.