The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete -- Longhair | Talk 00:03, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
Jest havin' a little fun. Denni☯ 17:02, 2005 August 14 (UTC)
Please don't make bad faith VfD nominations. Having said that, the article was previously listed as a speedy candidate. You have in fact extended the process unnecessarily. Rob ChurchTalk | Desk 17:05, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Can't we just re-speedy the delete of this patent nonsense? --DrTorstenHenning 17:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
Speedy delete, per above. -- BD2412talk 18:22, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.