Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epoline®

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and rename to epoline. --Edcolins 14:30, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Epoline®

Advertising. I'm not sure if this qualifies for speedy deletion so I'm listing it here. Delete. — JIP | Talk 13:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep as rewritten, but rename to Epoline without the registered sign. — JIP | Talk 14:32, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• delete Xpendersx 13:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• I don's see why this should be deleted, epoline is the range of online service of the EPO, free of charge and a service to the IP community - it is not advertising. Can you give some info on what to do to avoid deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.64.134.242 (talk • contribs)
• Keep as rewritten by myself. Moving it to epoline would be a wise and nice move. As you can see from the "What links here" page I had requested such an article since a long time. --Edcolins 14:35, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Epoline. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 21:26, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Move as per Rune Welsh. I've never seen any precedent here for having trademark symbols in article titles, and I don't think there's any legal basis for requiring it here. —HorsePunchKid→龜 07:25, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• I think it looks ok now - if there is need for more epoline info, such as detailed info on the whole range of products and services - I would be happy to supply. This is my first wiki experience so I still need to work out how this is done properly.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.64.134.242 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.