Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epicity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Epicity

Epicity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

While the user asserts that it is a new term, and it very well may be, it is as of now unverifiable. RunningOnBrains 18:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No google hits used epicity in this manner. Someguy1221 22:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Delete self-described neologism. Previously speedied by an admin. I asked the creator for some (a?) RS, with this response: "epicity is a brand new word. we are really just using it as shorthand notition in the field right now. when we have sources, i'll add them." --Dweller 13:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete - blatant OR/neologism. If this scale gains acceptance, it will first appear in tornado. Only if it gains wide acceptance and general use would its being a seperate article be justified. --EMS | Talk 18:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.