Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Fainchtein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enrique Fainchtein

Leaving aside BLP concerns and the fact that the article reads like a hatchet job, this does not seem to be notable individual. Fredrick day (talk) 14:30, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

      • Do Not Delete, Seems like this even with be notable in Los Angeles when it is also said and done. It must be noted that in the Los Angeles metropolitan region, ((Fleishman-Hillard))'s significant billing of the City of Los Angeles is along the same lines. If there's some neutrality, then why not attempt to balance it out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.106.18.11 (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC) — 71.106.18.11 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Speedy Delete/Strong Delete Essentially defamatory article written by someone who clearly is not enamored with this particular landlord. Some cleanup might neutralize it, but that means someone with a positive spin on this guy would have to chime in. Unlikely. Comparison with Fleishman-Hillard is way off base, since a) F-H had more global import b) F-H had wider reach, and most importantly, c) F-H is a company; this guy is a person and [W:BLP] comes into play. Finally, this seems of little import to any but local activists. Or the subject, I guess, but not in a positive way. ΨνPsinu 21:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:COATRACK. No attribution of notability to independent sources, so fails WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 23:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Ah, yes. I didn't know there was a term for this. Now I do. And to quote from the WP:COATRACK section, "When a biography of a living person is a coatrack, this is a very serious problem that requires drastic measures. It may all be true and it may all be sourced, but if a biography of a living person is a negatively-balanced coatrack, this is unacceptable." ΨνPsinu 16:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
      • Do Not Delete, Apparently this is based on the creation of knowledge of CA. Redevelopment law and/or the affordable housing process. Seems like this person is shaking up how tax-incremented financing is done in the Los Angeles area, or so it seems. The Court system in CA. seems like a pretty good source Dhardung. Alan Casden of Los Angeles, a developer who was tied to former-Hahn's corruption allegations is a better example than F & H. Even more to the point,Caruso_Affiliated, a development firm run by polarizing developer Rick Caruso who has also been in the middle of litigation in Glendale, CA. has a similar history...and is on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.75.194 (talk) 03:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC) — 76.79.75.194 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Strong Delete It seems to me like all of the support for keeping this particular page is from one source - note how both of the entries above that do not suggest Delete use the same, nonstandard format. I would guess it is the creator of the page, who appears to hold a pretty strong grudge. Please close this out to put this one-person campaign to rest before it becomes a problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.39.228 (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.