Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enozinho's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enozinho's Law

Enozinho's Law (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. Google notes 4 instances of use, excluding wikipedias. Deltopia 20:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, this should be deleted. A neologism coined on one blog with no evidence of currency elsewhere. Cruftbane 21:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I agree, a non-notable neologism, but one that seems strangely familiar. Isn't this a re-stating of Godwin's Law? In which case, credit has not been given where it's due. Accounting4Taste 23:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Just looked at the article again, the reference is there. If this was more notable/widespread, it could have been merged with Godwin's Law. Accounting4Taste 23:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The only source seems to be a blog discussion. --B. Wolterding 16:46, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.