Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enotary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 19:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enotary

Enotary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Can't find any sources besides the national notary association (1st-party) to back this up - verifiability in question Stifle (talk) 20:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I found 37,000 Ghits. [1] Disclosure - I'm a notary public. Bearian 21:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep A cursory search shows that e-notarization is up and running in Colorado [2], North Carolina [3], and Pennsylvania [4]. I stopped looking after that. SkerHawx 18:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Enough coverage in books [5] and scholarly articles exist [6]. --Kudret abi^Talk 06:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.