Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enlighten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enlighten

Enlighten (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. The subject fails to be notable per WP:CORP, and the article text borders on blatant advertising. In addition, the author of the current content replaced the existing content, which was about an entirely different organization, over the course of several edits. (The original article was re-posted under a better title.) Realkyhick 04:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable, borderline spam, plus improper removal of previous content. Realkyhick 04:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, reads more like a bio. CosmoNuevo 10:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources. Abeg92contribs 14:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Clearly non-notable, based on its own description of its major product Just above CSD. DGG 23:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.