Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Enhan

Possible hoax? Non-notable. Gflores^Talk 17:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - "It is not known how many people or who speaks it" ?? Wickethewok 17:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• People also say that this article should be deleted as unverifiable, non-notable, and probably just made up in school one day. --Deville (Talk) 17:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Original research, and also non-notable. A Google search yields one self-published 'book' on Lulu.com, which also seems made up. Hanako 18:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unverified original research.  (aeropagitica)  18:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Sounds interesting enough, but instead of giving answers the article only leaves questions. No factual backup at all, and Google isn't helpful either. I'd like to know more about the phenomenon, but in this form the article surely can't stay. —IJzeren Jan _{In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij} 06:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.