Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enginet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 08:56, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Enginet

non notable neologism Lunkwill 09:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Delete: neologism which appears in a single book, fails google test. (The results refer to a trademarked software/service or other things unrelated to the contents of this article). I'm also putting the author's (auto)bio up for deletion: Jim Banister. Note the single author with all edits to both articles. Lunkwill 09:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Eusebeus 07:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Stifle 00:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.