Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Links

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. The page has been merged to Energy (disambiguation), and as such, history should not be deleted under the GFDL. The dab was already marked for a merge and redirect when it was at Energy (Disambiguation) - I moved it there myself to restore relevant history that had been lost in the move of Energy (physics) to Energy. That tag was pulled by the dab's creator who also moved to Energy Links, which is what resulted in the current AfD. There shouldn't be an article at Energy Links, but now that I have moved the history back to Energy (Disambiguation), the redirect can be safely deleted through RfD if desired. It seems relatively harmless, though. Dekimasuよ! 03:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Energy Links

Energy Links (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Disparate and ill-titled collection of topics that have the word "energy" in the title. This purpose is better served by the existing disambiguation page, Energy (disambiguation) Itub 12:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Article tries to be a disambig page. Has already tried to be moved but a good disambig already exists on Energy (disambiguation). Zap this one. --Bren ^talk 12:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Article is redundant and arbitrary. --Nonstopdrivel 13:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete once it has been merged into Energy (disambiguation). Robert K S 14:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Hu12 16:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--The list can be better assimiliated with list of energy topicsHallenrm 18:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- per all of the above. Eddie 20:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

• Merge I strongly disagree. There are many more links in this article than in the other disambiguation page. They should be copied into the other article and their histories merged. JRSpriggs 08:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Is that possible, to merge histories of two articles? Robert K S 12:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
    • My understanding is that administrators can do that. I have read their conversations about doing it. However, I have never looked at the result of such a merger to see what happens. JRSpriggs 03:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.