Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enemy Territory Fortress

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix ʕ 00:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Enemy Territory Fortress

  • Delete - Unnotable mod. Should be deleted unless solid evidence of notability is provided. --nlitement [talk] 23:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
  • This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 16:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Nom is violating WP:Point, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/True_Combat:_Elite. That said, Delete --Mmx1 23:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, not a run-of-the-mill unreleased/beta mod played by two people. =) ETF has been published, actually finalized nowadays and, as far as I know, also got some media buzz (a Slashdot article, at least). It's widely played, too, unless it suddenly died down or something while I wasn't looking. I'll try to find some other media mentions if possible. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    • OK, I touched it up a little. Probably needs more work. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:40, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
    • I'm changing to Keep or failing that Merge to Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (or Team Fortress). I was first a little bit skeptical about the nom's claims elsewhere that this has 20 players, but looks like that while there's tons of servers, almost all are empty and there was like 30 players. Egh. So, er, it did die down. However, the mod itself is notable enough for a mention in an article; I'm really not sure if it's notable enough for an article of its own. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 22:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Keep

.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.