The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpowerháblame 22:49, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete as hoax. Google gives no hits on this name, nor many of its permutations. [1] Created by a similar IP as Darragh Connaughton, see related AfDSam Vimes 17:36, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete it's a bit hard to assume good faith on 193.203.140.163 and 193.203.140.84. squell 18:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Strong Delete I'm suprised the content was not eligible for speedy deletion DaGizzaChat(c) 08:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Strong Delete as above. Stephen Turner 09:01, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.