Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopodia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Rename to Wikipedia:Encyclopodia. Redirect was deleted, since it's cross-namespace. ---J.S (T/C) 22:16, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Encyclopodia
In the absence of any mentioned notability I propose moving this article to Wikipedia:Encyclopodia but would be happy if instead some thrid party references could be added. --BozMo talk 16:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unless it is notable to warrent an article by itself. Here is the question: is it well known or published OUTSIDE of Wikipedia? As far as know, the answer is no. FirefoxMan 19:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Move I believe that this is useful, but not aricle notable. Imagine having wikipedia on your ipod. This should be on wikipedia butnot in article space. The Placebo Effect 20:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Move to Wikipedia:Encyclopodia as suggested. While useful, it isn't notable enough for a mainspace article. Koweja 20:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Move per nom Shas 21:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep or Move. I just searched for this today and found the info I was looking for. Why do people always want to delete everything... it's so stupid. If it's moved, will I still be able to find it by searching for "encyclopodia" .. if not, Keep. --JeffryJohnston 01:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.