Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empiere of Moravia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – Rich Farmbrough 12:03, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Empiere of Moravia

Not notable. It looks like it has been deleted once before on 9 December 2004. The related page Self-proclaimed Emperors of Moravia and its "government" is also vfd Bollar 02:50, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete "...is a Micronation..." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:11, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, micronation cruft. Megan1967 05:07, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Only google hit for "Empiere of Moravia" is deleteion note from last time. This is not the historic Empire of Moravia. -- Infrogmation 05:27, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, standard micronation vanity article. Average Earthman 07:51, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Great Moravia. Martg76 11:15, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Why? What does one have to do with the other? RickK 23:11, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Yes it's a micronation, but that's not why I'm voting delete. Only notable micronations should get their own article, like for example Rose Island. Stancel 17:38, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all micronations. RickK 23:11, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Patent nonsense. I am from Czech Republic and would hear about that. Pavel Vozenilek 11:29, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

NOT DELETE-1th I couldn't create an own website yet.2.the newpapers around here are so greedy they want payment for such a publication,or they told me that either im a freak,cook,weirdo,pervert,madman,etc.etc.etc. or said they have no rome,time or will.Consider it this way:if you would bust your brains out to actually get so,ethink noted,for what you have only paper-evidence(inpenendance proclamations,calls to the people,etc...)and you dont have a skaner,you hope the people will belive you.And if they dont,you have full right to be angry.And if people dont trust one-another anymore,then i ges the worlds gome more to heck than i thought.The principe of a micronation is as far as i know CLAIM and PROCLAMATION.This page does not say(to the best of my knowledge) that in order to be listed here you need a WEBSITE.The first king of Redobda also didnt have a homepage,yet is still recognised.The island also doesnt have any newpaper as far as i know curently,so no newsaper IN REDONDA mentioned the CLAIM for redonda's THRONE.Another thing-why cant a person proclaim a micronation HERE and not be acused of VANDALISM?I could also complain how i used,under various other nicks,knock my Brains out to MODIFY this site nad what do i GET?The COLD SHOULDER,thats what.PEOPLE,have a heart.Besides i've got a internet newpaper (www.solokapr.cz)in witch,"under circumstances"(thats what one of its editors told me)"my case" could be presented.Wait a 2,2 weeks and see(its wery far into the centre of thet newspaper from my home and i need to get all materials together.

Your ever-so angry David.

Ps:If there wasnt i you STILL woildnt have the deposed monarchs lists from the 19th-before the 17th century.Think about what YOU write in articles and THEN re-consider your aproach on maters,such as Deletion,even though the said thing does not technicaly range beyond the limits of the describsion of a certain subject(i repete the generals for a MICRONATION:A PROCLAMATIOn and NO RECOGNITION.

PPS:To rick:the "nation" claims succession of the "Greta Morava" state.

PPPS:to Boller:Well,that was not my work,but i think it could have been one of my asociates,to witch i spoke on the Matter.

PPPPS:to all the others-you have no trust to anybody,if you cannot trust another persons sworn word.I SWEAR on MY LIFE that this is true.If this is igonred,then all MY TRUST for other peoples words seams not in fashion.

The above was written by 85.70.52.185 at 16:09 and 16:16, 12 May 2005. Contributions. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable --Neigel von Teighen 16:14, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Strond Delete. Non-Notable, possible kook entry (see rant above). --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 01:50, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable - a self-proclaimed nation that "DOESN'T EVEN HAVE ITS WEBPAGE?" :) Matt ෙ 14:54, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

NOT DELETE-YOU WANTED RECOGNITION ILL GIVE YOU RECOGNITION on: http://www.kingnicholas.com/2005/05/international-diplomacy.html

the page of a micronation you RECOGNISED AS SUCH is the information on my

comunication with Nicholas I, of the Copeman Empiere and his "response",when

you click on it enholds:

"I certainly see no problem in recognising your empire's existence. "

How's them aples?

Your ever so PLEASED Tomislav I. or as some of my oponents here could write 85.70.52.185

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.