Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Tianzuodi of Liao

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was that the article was rewritten into a valid stub and kept. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:35, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emperor Tianzuodi of Liao

Nonsense or hugely lacking in context. Not worth keeping either way. --fvw* 05:13, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Hoax. --Apyule 05:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Reserved pending changes by Nateji77. --Apyule 07:27, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Keep after changes. --Apyule 05:15, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep real person[1], bogus content. i'll write a stub about when i'm on a computer with cjk. Nateji77 07:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Comment very short stub finished. Nateji77 04:51, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep if rewritten by user Nateji77. Capitalistroadster 07:30, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Move to Emperor Tianzuodi of Liao China as suggested on Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board/Complete to do. Alf 11:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Current stub is good enough for me, Keep. --fvw* 17:53, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Creating a garbage article on an obscure but genuinely notable historical figure is a very subtle form of vandalism; I'm impressed that the article's been salvaged. Keep. DS 19:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• keep if you see an article that needs improvement, improve it! Trollderella 20:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep at Tianzuodi of Liao following convention for monarchs. Gazpacho 17:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.