Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emperor Benedict XVI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 19:03, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emperor Benedict XVI

NN. Google produces 20 hits. Erwin Walsh

  • Keep. See Satire. ‡ Jarlaxle 20:01, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
    • Should darthbenedict.ytmnd.com this be added as an external link to the article? ‡ Jarlaxle 20:08, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, appears to be a hoax (how could a comic titled "Emperor Benedict XVI" have started in November 2004 if Benedict was only elected in April 2005?) -- Kirill Lokshin 20:35, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. A non-notable character who appears in a non-notable web comic that ran for less than a year before shutting down. Sdedeo 20:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Kirill Lokshin. --Scimitar parley 20:50, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Kirill Lokshin. -- DS1953 22:40, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per Sdedeo. JDoorjam 23:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Who wrote this? Luke 'Paisley' Skywalker? (well I suppose that would make the - 'I am you Father' bit really interesting)--Doc (?) 00:34, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Hoax - Aranda56 20:33ET, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete nn at best. --Etacar11 02:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Ha ha. Banes 08:36, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete (don't forget the image) as it appears to be hoaxy and fail Webcomic inclusion guidelines. I wonder if the author of this article or the webcomic was involved in the vandalism of the Pope Benedict XVI article. - Mgm|(talk) 10:47, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable and wrong (how can the opposite of Benedict XVI be cruel and stupid?) — JIP | Talk 10:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Being wrong is IIRC no grounds for deletion. But there are enough reasons left to Delete this. --DrTorstenHenning 17:53, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.