Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy Riedl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 14:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Emmy Riedl

Unverifiable person. A google search gives no relevant results although does give some German websites, so could any german-speaking users can check them out? Anyway the talk page discussion shows some people have already tried to find references but have failed to get any. If references are so hard to come by probably person is non-notable. Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 06:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete appears either NN or hoax. Zero hits for "Konsumgenossenschaftliches Familienblatt" on Google for web, usenet and Books, or on Amazon.de. One hit for "Emmy Riedl" on Google Books (not viewable) a single hit on Amazon.de (again, I couldn't view it). "Emmeline Riedl" didn't appear to return any relevant ghits. The Frankfurt Uni hit, an announcement from 2004, is not for the same person as the article. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, unveifiable. --Terence Ong 14:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete If it's not a hoax, she's non-notable; either way, it can't be verified, so it doesn't matter. -- Kicking222 15:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. ILovePlankton ^{( L)} 17:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.