Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem's fifth studio album

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 17:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eminem's fifth studio album

Eminem's fifth studio album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's one thing to have articles on future releases (many, including me, object to that), but an article on something that doesn't even have name? It can't be notable — it's a thing of rumour and speculation. Mel Etitis (Talk) 13:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball. Evilclown93 14:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball. The article says that it is "according to rumors", and an encyclopedia is not a repository of rumours. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete "Rumors", "could be", many unconfirmed content in the article. Until solid confirmations are released, this article should not be here per WP:CRYSTAL.--Kylohk 10:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Keep per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules]]Inx272

  • Delete and throw a crystal ball at the creator because nobody would ever actually type Eminem's Fifth Studio Album into the search box when looking for an article. This is all ill-informed conjecture, if/when this album is actually announced (complete with title) then it will be notable under that name. This article, however, is a load of balls. A1octopus 15:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.