Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily The Strange

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. I'll redirect it to Emily Strange. dbenbenn | talk 14:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Emily The Strange

Advertising, vanity, the images are probably copyrighted. RickK 05:47, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)

• Remove images, rewrite, and keep. The brand has become quite popular in recent times around here. Slac speak up! 05:48, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. 240,000 Google hits, see [1]. Megan1967 07:06, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Concur with the comments below. Probably best Emily Strange be moved here instead. Megan1967 09:10, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; a fairly well known comic/marketing whatever. -- Smerdis of Tlön 17:45, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Terrible article, but the subject deserves an article as a notable something-or-other. I was thinking about adding this to the lists of requests. Gamaliel 22:16, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete and move Emily Strange to Emily the Strange. Gamaliel 03:07, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I'll start clean-up now. -- user:zanimum
• Keep and allow for organic growth. VfD is not cleanup. --GRider\^talk 22:25, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete come on folks, this is just an ad. Fawcett5 22:56, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

change to Redirect as below. Fawcett5 00:35, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Emily Strange, although Emily Strange might be better moved to Emily the Strange. -Sean Curtin 00:15, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Merge and delete.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.