Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsie Weyburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 05:13, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Elsie Weyburn

Not a notable person yet, but may be one day. I have been unable to find any references or justification for notability except perhaps acting as "Unpaid Spectator" in the Surviving Gilligan's Island: The Incredibly True Story of the Longest Three Hour Tour in History [1] TV show. Please see WP:BIO for guidelines on inclusion of biographies. BenjaminTsai 08:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --BenjaminTsai 08:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:BIO. Indeed, the article could almost be an A7 speedy delete although claims of being a self made millionaire is an assertion of notability. The article would be better if it spent more time trying to establish notability and less talking about her dog. Capitalistroadster 09:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep per nomination. I've heard of her. Then again, I'm from the area and she's local talk! This page will come in handy for us locals when I tell everyone it's here! Southpaws03 09:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
  • "Per nomination"? You think she should be kept because she's "not a notable person"?  :P — Haeleth Talk

• Delete non-notable and vanity bio. I hope Southpaws' comment doesnt mean an invasion of local meat puppets. I see southpaws contribution history is totally new too. Bwithh 14:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete there's no longer any reference to the dog Seriously, why not create an account and move this to your user page until the WP:BIO guidelines are met? Dlyons493 Talk 14:24, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn-bio. — Haeleth Talk 14:29, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO or as non-verifiable. A 25-year-old self-made millionaire might be notable, but an article that discusses her hobbies but not her business is not encyclopedic. --Metropolitan90 16:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.