Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsebeth Baumgartner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Eluchil404 23:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Elsebeth Baumgartner

Article is about a non-notable crackpock who faces multiple charges of harassment and intimidation. I feel sorry for her, but she needs a shrink not jail time and a Wikipedia article. Baumgartner brings up 559 hits on Google many of these being Wiki mirrors. Delete. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 16:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, but the article needs a major rewrite. It has a very strong POV and non-encyclopedic tone, but I think the subject is notable. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 17:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete Did this story get any play outside of Ohio? Seems like a local story. Fan-1967 21:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep Stong keep I cleaned up the article a bit. I changed my vote when I did a lexis nexis acedmic search on this woman, there are 278 articles on her, see the titles of all 278 articles here. Definetly notable. If every highschool in the state of Idaho deserves a page, Category:High_schools_in_Idaho I think some "kook" from Ohio, who has had 278 articles in Ohio newspapers written about her, deserves a page. Maybe she is a crackpot, as the Cleveland Scene newspaper called her (#2), but that theory can be developed fully in the article. Travb (talk) 08:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Stong keep I think it is definetly notable, and given the subject, people may want to view it. I did. User:Kirkoconnell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.13.26 (talk • contribs)

  Comment: Preceeding Vote added by IP address. alphaChimp ^laudare 21:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Stong keep Keep it as it was - Adam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.75.6 (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.